By Gerry Barker
July 2, 2019
How low can the Tribune stoop to deny full access to its online news?
In all the years of working in the news business, I have never witnessed a newspaper reject access of its online content that has already been published.
Is it possible they are building a list of future subscribers?
Here is what the organization that owns the weekly newspaper demands before you can access content online. This is reproduced from the Mercury Tribune online website under the heading “Local News.”
Unless you aren’t registered to receive the complete story online, the following is posted on the Mercury Tribune’s website:
HEADING -Guelph could phase out vacant property tax discount by 2021Currently, vacant and excess commercial and industrial lands see 30% discount on property taxes
News Jun 26, 2019 Guelph Mercury
In a report to council, city staff is proposing to phase out the 30-per-cent property tax discount for vacant and excess commercial and industrial properties by 2021. – Dreamtime
Owners of vacant commercial and vacant properties may soon have to start paying the same tax rates as others in the city.
According to a report to be presented to councillors at their July 2 meeting of committee of the whole, city staff are recommending that the property tax discount for vacant and excess commercial and industrial lands be phased out over the next two years. (Balance of the article is blanked out)
You’ve reached your article limit (Directed at guelphspeaks)
Already have a Torstar account? Sign In
Please register to support the local, relevant news you need from a source you trust.
Register now and enjoy:
- Breaking news that affects your community
- The latest neighbourhood news, opinions and insight
- Ability to comment on articles
- Access to our events calendar, including the ability to submit your own listings.
* * * *
Torstar is the corporation that owns the Toronto Star and Metroland Publishing that owns the Mercury Tribune. Now, you may ask, why is there an arbitrary limit to access the full article online, as published free every Thursday?
Am I the only reader who has reached his article limit? Perhaps the Tribune management should explain why the restriction online access is only to those who register.
This is a form of public information censorship that only one major advertiser would request.
The only advertiser who resen any criticism of its operations by gielphspeaks.ca is the City of Guelph administration.
The Tribune refuses to label the city administration’s weekly ads labeled “City News” when, in fact, it is advertising and not labeled as such. The kicker is that these “City News” ads are paid with public funds.
Now some of the “City News” content, as published weekly in the Tribun includes legal notices that are required to be published. It remains advertising and not news. Missing is the city logo. Wonder why?
But that does not excuse the city spending thousands of public funds to pretend the content is legitimate news. Perhaps the following Tribune statement urging readers to register to get their news online explains it:
“Please register to support the local, relevant news you need from a source you trust.”
Two words stick out from this statement, ‘support’ and ‘trust.’
Believe me, I know from personal experience that both those words can mean the opposite.
I can only comment about the Tribune statement using the expression, ‘support local, relevant news you need.’ It’s not only an untrue premise but a deceptive way to disguise the Tribune’s real intent to support the administration’s point of view.
This comes down to trust.
How can the thousands of citizens who receive the free ad-heavy Mercury Tribune each week trust the content? More important why is the city paying to print only one side of the story produced by the city’s communications department?
I know what it has cost me to defend my right to speak freely as outlined in the Canadian Charter of Rights.
It comes down to public participation in government affairs without the threat of litigation to prevent it.
This concerns every citizen to be able to access information and comment on it wuthout the threat of costly retaliation.
One final question to ask yourself: Would you have voted to merge Guelph Hydro with Alectra Utilities in December 2017?
Well, ten elected members of council did and that sealed the deal.
That was the most lurid misuse of the public trust that this city has endured in the past 13 years.
Trust is not just a five-letter word.