Yipeekio! The Farbridge gang rides again

Posted March 26, 2015

The council passed 2015 operating and capital budgets early this morning that included a 3.55 percent property tax increase. Joanne Shuttleworth, the Mercury reporter covering city hall, was hard pressed to file all the details due to deadline pressure.

That final tax increase exceeded the staff’s proposed budget by .5 per cent.

What she did manage to report was that the council approved spending $600,000 on building a multi-use active transportation lane on Woodlawn road. Translation: another expensive bike lane on a major road. It is a major cave-in to a minority group of cyclists who represent about 1 per cent of the Guelph population. First their request for $300,000 was rejected but then they persuaded the majority of council to spend $600,000/

It’s the Lance Armstrong syndrome: If you build it, they will come.

Another item was spending an undisclosed amount to resurface the ice pad in front of city hall. The question arises why does it need resurfacing after only four years? Coun. Dan Gibson moved to remove that from the capital budget. He also moved to remove a computer replacement plan (cost unknown). Both his motions were defeated.

But spending $25,000 to remove the signs at the West End recreation centre was chopped from the budget.

But the elephant in the chamber was the Urbacon settlement costs.

Recall the claim by Chief Administrative Officer, Ann Pappert, that the $8,935,000 settlement charges would not affect the ratepayers’ tax rates? Well, it will to the tune of $900,000 plus “associated costs” a year for the next six years. Let’s take a closer look at this.

During the budget meeting, Mayor Cam Guthrie said: “I thought the community was told that Urbacon wouldn’t impact the taxpayer, but in fact, there is a repayment.”

Urbacon and the lawyers have been paid. The money came from three unrelated reserve funds.

Also paid, were the two companies hired to complete the new city hall and renovate the old one into a provincial courthouse. The $4.5 million settlement owed to the subcontractors has also been paid.

Where did that money come from? None of it was budgeted by the city council.

It gets stranger. Doing the math on the $900,000 to be repaid over six years equals $5,400,000. That’s $3.535 million short of the $8.935 million. Remember the $900,000 each year was to replenish the three reserve funds? These are the same funds that were drained to pay off Urbacon and the lawyers.

That money is public money, generated from municipal taxes and user fees.

Then Coun. Karl Wettstein moved that the amount be reduced to $500,000 in 2015 and “allow the staff to figure out a suitable repayment schedule after that”. It was passed by a majority of council.

Wettstein’s motion just kicks the can down the road. Yet, he was unable to convince council to agree to build the South End Recreation Centre, a project that has been in the planning stage for more than 10 years.

It is now clear that the seven Farbridge supporters are still controlling the show.

Supporting this large property tax increase and water increase costs is more of the same tactics the majority of voters rejected last October.

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under Between the Lines

5 responses to “Yipeekio! The Farbridge gang rides again

  1. Joe Black

    They all should be ashamed of themselves. All wages and spending should be frozen .Fire and police , city workers should have been layoff.City consul should have their wages reduce for their lack of monetary irresponsible.I like the city of Guelph but its time to move on in a few years I will not be able to afford to live here with the high property taxes and services e.g.: water etc.

  2. geo

    So disappointed. I was looking forward to seeing a new financially responsible Council in action, holding the line on spending.
    Instead they put taxes up 3.55%,( my last raise was 1.5%) water rates up 4.1% and lots of new hires to boot.
    These guys are worse then the last group.

  3. Essie

    Just to clarify/correct a couple of your assertions, Gerry – the transportation lane on Woodlawn includes both a sidewalk and a bicycle path, and is overdue simply in terms of safety if nothing else. I think it’s a worthwhile, practical investment in infrastructure. Secondly, the money for the ice pad is actually for a resurfacing machine (i.e. Zamboni) – and it was explained at the budget meeting that the new machine will go into service at one of the heavily used indoor rinks, while the oldest one in the system gets bumped down to use at the city hall rink. Not sure why the motion was worded to suggest otherwise, since Andy Van Hellemond’s question to staff last night confirmed the actual intention of the purchase. I don’t think any of the decisions made by council last night were taken lightly – there was lots of informed, respectful discussion before the budget was approved.

    • Brent

      Guthrie has some splaining to do!!!!!!! Seems he has been defending Pappert too…an excessively paid CEO that doesn’t, know the value of our tax dollars..and clearly out of touch with the average tax payer. Time to show her the exit door.

  4. Jerry

    I still cannot understand why the city can not go to the business along
    woodlawn rd affected by this sidewalk issue and get them to chip in on the
    costs.It benefits them with more business and safety of employees and remember if they extend the sidewalk it will also mean more costs to plow
    and maintain.In big business the costs is always passed down the line so
    why not here.
    Develop partnerships with them and spare the taxpayers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s