Farbridge’s re-election brochures: Same music, same lyrics but fails to make the hit parade

Posted October 7, 2014

Comparing Mayor Farbridge’s 2010 and 2014 re-election brochures there are the same four main themes:

Bringing jobs to Guelph

Let’s parse the first re-worked theme. In her 2010 the mayor promised to bring more jobs to Guelph. In 2014 she says 1,000 new jobs were created by three organizations. She does not explain job attrition, companies and businesses having left the city since 2008. She does not explain the more than 200 full-time equivalent city staff added to the payroll since 2010.

In fact, her administration, in eight years, has not increased the industrial/commercial assessment of 16 per cent of total assessment of all properties in the city. The remainder, residential assessment contributes 84 per cent of the property tax revenues. The ideal ratio is 60 per cent residential and 40 per cent industrial/commercial.

The facts are that her alleged job increases are way below the provincial average for similar-sized communities. Guelph’s unique location with ample access to major markets and an available, qualified workforce should see much greater growth with better management of the file. It remains a major economic blunder, publicized as “The Guelph Fatcor,” that affects every citizen in Guelph.

Putting People First

The Mayor pledged in 2010 to “making it easier for everyone to access the information, services and resources they need.” In 2014, under the same heading, the Mayor states that: “We completed Value for Dollar audits, identifying $3.5 million in potential savings of taxpayer’s money.”

Using the word “potential” makes one wonder how she skipped some of the following:

The internal audit that revealed in 2013, of $5.2 million costs of staff overtime and absenteeism, twice what was paid the previous year. That loss was not “potential”, but real.

Or how about the costs of the Wellington Dufferin Guelph Public Health lawsuit initiated by the Farbridge Administration and lost? The city never informed the citizens of the legal costs and was forced to pay $10 million as its share of the new Public Health headquarters on Stone Road. Wonder which reserve account was used for that one?

Then there is Urbacon. That lawsuit has increased the cost of the new City Hall from $42 million to $57 million, (all city announced figures) with additional details to follow. That chewed up $15 million so far.

It’s hard to reconcile the mayor’s statement indicating potential savings of $3.5 million of the taxpayer’s money with reality.

Then there was the three week strike of transit workers. The administration could not even get the cost of the settlement right. It was really 8.8 per cent not 6.48 per cent as announced by the city. This was putting people first?

Investing and protecting our Environment

In her 2014 brochure, Mayor Farbridge claims that the “composting facility is back in business, helping to divert more than 2/3 of our residential waste from the landfill.”

The $34 million composting plant, financed by the citizens of Guelph, is still not operating at its processing capacity of 30,000 tonnes per year. In fact, when a load of compostable material is dumped in the plant, if there is any material that will not compost, the entire load is delivered to the landfill.

Even materials such a glass in the recycling plant are broken up and transferred to the landfill.

Linamar must remove all its wastewater at its expense and ship it to the landfill. Yet still pay for the waste water service through their property tax bill.

Then there are more than 6,000 residences and businesses that must pay private contractors to pick up their unsorted waste and then it’s shipped to the landfill.

And who would have dreamed that Guelph would be processing recyclable materials from Detroit. So much so that the city had to hire a second shift at the Recycle plant to handle the volume. But at what cost?

The millions that the Farbridge administration has spent of the Waste Resources Innovation Centre is a case of a council gone wild spending the citizen’s treasure. Most of the development planning decisions and operating costs have been kept from the citizens.

Investing in Our Neighbourhoods

Her 2014 brochure applauds “doubling the bike lanes, built new parks (?), added new trails and started community gardens”.

If the mayor is privy to any polling re bike lanes, she will be surprised to learn that the greater majority of residents are not supportive. In fact, her administration has done more in eight years to restrict vehicular traffic by removing lanes that have been repaved, and failing to build downtown parking garages.

To applaud such downtown developments as Market Square, the Guelph Central Station and the Civic Museum is disingenuous at best. What she doesn’t talk about is her failed promise to build a new downtown library (the library chief recently gave up and has moved to Windsor).

The Central Station is a planned disaster with no parking and limited shelter. The $16 million civic museum was nothing but a political move to save a derelict building in the name of heritage and promoted by Coun. Leanne Piper. The building had horrific cost overruns and bears little resemblance to the original with a giant glass façade. The city has yet to release attendance figures and operating costs.

Another four years of this political magical mystery tour orchestrated by Mayor Farbridge, will result in soaring taxes, and user fees. There will be more of the same manipulated dreck the citizens have had to endure in the past eight years.

Ask yourself: Is the Farbridge goal of being the greenest city in Canada fit into your civic priorities?

No? First, fix what’s broken and give the Farbridge Field of Dreams a rest.

We can start by fixing the sidewalks, potholes and do something about that damned Wyndham Street underpass that that the Farbridge administration screwed up.

Discover New Directions- Guelph and a plan to bring the city back to the people. Details are in the Thursday Tribune for the next three weeks.



Filed under Between the Lines

8 responses to “Farbridge’s re-election brochures: Same music, same lyrics but fails to make the hit parade

  1. Alan J

    I always smile at the end of a GRG blog as it’s claims to be “impartial” but is so vociferously anti-Farbridge it is now way too toxic even for Guthrie who is trying very hard to distance himself from GRG as quickly as possible.

    I am not happy with the current administration/council either but more balanced – and less hysterical – criticism would have been far more effective. Alas, I think it’s too late. GRG has shot itself in the foot which is an opprtunity lost.

    • Alan J: GrassRoots Guelph has never claimed it was “impartial”. We are very partial to the negligent way this city has been run for the past eight years. GRG and guelphspeaks.ca has been the sole, consistent critic of the Farbridge administration. You describe the criticism as toxic, as does your mayor, when the facts don’t support that argument. GRG did not waste $15 million of city treasure on a new city hall. That money is like a beer, its empty calories only in this case it our money that has left this community with absolutely no value. The Farbridge administration has wasted millions attempting to create a city in their own image: No cars, 100 per cent diversion from the landfill, miles of bike lanes, forcing a major shift in housing to intensify multiple family dwellings, pay developers to build condominiums downtown, divert capital from serving the wards outside of downtown to create a new town centre, one in which in eight years has not solved the weekend problems of public fouling of the streets. And you call GRG and guelphspeaks toxic and extreme? GRG was not running the city, Karen Farbridge and her bloc of supporters on council were in charge. People are not stupid, they have figured it out, it’s time to change.

  2. Paul I

    Get used to it Gerry, The Farbridge supporters will attempt to denigrate the work that GRG has done. They crawl out of the (rotten) woodwork that is City Hall under the Farbridge Administration. The biggest achievement of her regime is WASTE. Wasted tax dollars on renovating the downtown., wasted tax dollars on social engineering projects that are not well thought out.. Like $12 millions on re-engineering the City streets for bike lanes, turning wide City streets into useless single lane roads, and a misallocation into the City bus transit in the false belief that Guelph residents WANT to use buses instead of cars. A failure to create jobs, and a failure to invest in infrastructure in the City. I am sick of the pothole infested roads throughout this City. 86% of the City revenue is from the residential sector with no signs of relief. Good planning indicates that the proper ratio is 60% residential and 40% Industrial/commercial. With a Places to grow plan for 50,000 more people in the City in about 20 to 30 years where is the Industrial/Commercial land to provide the 12,000 to 15,000 jobs we will need? We don’t have any and in the meantime IMICO sits vacant and ignored while the 800 or more acres of the reformatory lands just sits there as a wasted resource.
    Guelph used to be a balanced City with plenty of Industries and jobs for local people. Now Guelph is just a bedroom City and our Provincial Politicians seem to think that salvation lies in a double track to Union Station in Toronto so people in Guelph can commute to work. What a disaster!
    How did this City lose its way? Farbridge and her misguided vision!
    One final thought – It is Time for radical change. We need to invest in a Council that is concerned with NEEDS not Wants. Vote wisely on Oct 27!

  3. joseph paul phelan

    Won’t be long now til she is gone……the damage unfortunately is done….

  4. Joseph Blowseph

    Investing and protecting our environment while the areas around Eastview, Starwood, Fleming Rd and Watson Pkwy N have been absolutely plundered for more suburbs. What a joke.

  5. geo

    Give an outside consultant hundreds of thousands of tax dollars to improve bus service and the result is rider ship goes down.
    Then respond to the situation by covering your ears and humming loudly until the bad people go away.
    This typifies Her Royal Highness and Court’s approach to running the City.
    It is beyond me how anyone who can think for themselves would vote these people back in.

  6. Len H.

    Speaking of voting. Has anyone tried to vote online? I have and keep getting kicked back to main page. Trying to wear me down maybe? Not a chance. I will make sure my vote helps get rid of the garbage at city hall.

  7. Nax

    Len H:
    I voted on-line and it was easy and simple AND IT WORKED FIRST TIME!!Read the letter you got and follow the directions and it will work fine.
    My only concern is that there is no confirmation of your vote!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s