It’s a good thing says Mercury municipal reporter exposing her bias –

Posted July 6, 2014

Ms. Shuttleworth is the municipal reporter for the Mercury and her comments are not supported by guelphspeaks and GrassRoots Guelph.

In the public interest, the following comment is published in the Guelph Mercury blog: 58 Carden Street blog by Joanne Shuttleworth.

“From a focus on community well-being as the lens to make decisions, to the organizational restructuring, to the many personnel changes over the past 10 years, Guelph City Hall is a different animal now.

“And that’s a good thing.

“There are still times when it could function better, but light-years ahead of the quibbling, bickering, and personal attacks of yesteryear.”

Really, Joanne?

Does community well-being include spending millions on waste management including $34 million for a compost processing plant that is three times the size needed for the next 20 years? And then selling two-thirds of that capacity to the Region of Waterloo at 8 per cent of the operating cost to Guelph?

Or having the city install a $15 million cart/bin collection system that fails to serve 13 per cent of the households and businesses in Guelph? Was that a good thing?

Or having three CAO’s and five CFO’s in eight years? This you describe as restructuring but most people would describe it as destructuring.

Or in just eight years seeing property tax increases rise by 35 per cent and water rates by 77 per cent? This has resulted in Guelph having one of the highest tax rates in Ontario. And if the Mayor and her council cohorts are re-elected in October, they will continue to tax us more in order to pay for their past mistakes.

Was the Urbacon decision a good thing?

Or rebuilding the bridge on Wyndham Street that large commercial vehicles cannot pass through? But for more than 20 years previously, those trucks could pass under the bridge.

Or, establishing a holding company – Guelph Municipal Holdings Inc – to control Guelph Hydro, the Guelph Junction Railroad, Envida Corporation and, a real estate company to dispose of city property. This is controlled by Mayor Farbridge and answers to no one. Through this corporation, Mayor Farbridge will be able to sell Guelph Hydro with no input from council or the citizens.

Or closing down a major city construction project by firing the contractor, Urbacon Buildings, and being found guilty of wrongful dismissal? The decision will cost the taxpayers in Guelph dearly. Well-being is associated with this fiasco?

Or planning to build a structure on the Baker Street Parking lot to house Conestoga College, the YMCA and the Library, none of which pay property taxes? Joanne, it seems whenever the city builds something, its costs soar over budget, it is not completed on time and other projects are shuffled into a ten-year capital-spending plan.

Or subsiding hi-rise builders with funds from the Brownfield regeneration reserve and spending millions allegedly revitalizing downtown Guelph? Yet council is unable to solve the problem of rowdyism that plagues the area at night and weekends.

Or resurfacing major roads and then restricting vehicle lanes from four to two to provide for wider bicycle lanes? This is part of the Farbridge council’s war on cars. They actually believe that a combination of public transit, use of bicycles and misguided urban planning will reduce use of automobiles in Guelph.

Finally, Innovation Guelph, another layer of bureaucracy, in which the city staff has developed detailed plans for the former Reformatory lands owned by the Province. This is yet another case where taxpayer money is being spent planning land usage on property the city doesn’t own.

Still think this is a good thing?

Nothing Personal Joanne, but as a reporter your responsibility is to remain neutral covering the news. Such as your predecessor, who mixed reporting with opinion, it is a betrayal to the reader who, expects objectivity and not subjective comments in your copy.



Filed under Between the Lines

3 responses to “It’s a good thing says Mercury municipal reporter exposing her bias –

  1. boomer

    “light-years ahead of the quibbling, bickering, and personal attacks of yesteryear”. I really hope she’s kidding or she’s for sure smoking something that the realists are not. Prior to David Creech our CAO was Milt Sather and yes HE held that position for a long time. Council ran like a good Swiss watch, it ran like a business and made decisions based on the ENTIRE community not the vested interests of council members or special interest groups that exist in the minority of our population. Our tax rate changed but not much annually. We had BUSINESS people on council because THEY understood how to run things successfully and thoroughly. This group albeit a couple are lost. No direction, no leadership, no thought. It’s a tight knit group of 8 who run the show with no regard for the citizens. Let’s show these people the door come October.

  2. geo

    Hear hear boomer well said.

  3. Mary Heyens

    Thank you Boomer, your facts help me review past City Council and CAO Milt Sather. I hope you submit your commment to the local newspapers too and your point of view is heard.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s